It's easy to assume that the more information we collect, the smarter our decisions will be. Many professionals believe that if they keep collecting data, they'll eventually arrive at the best choice. In theory, having lots of data sounds like a good thing - more facts, more clarity, right? But the evidence shows that this is just a myth: at a certain point, extra data can overwhelm our brains and actually make decision-making harder, not easier.
Research shows that simply piling on more data often leads to confusion, second-guessing and worse decisions, rather than clearer insights. A recent large-scale study (over 14,000 people worldwide) by Oracle, titled 'The Decision Dilemma' found striking examples of this 'data overload' paradox:
• Less confidence: 83% of respondents assumed that having more data should make decisions easier, yet 86% said that in reality, the more data they had, the less confident they became about their decisions. In other words, drowning in data often undermines confidence.
• Analysis paralysis: 72% of people in the same survey admitted that being overwhelmed by data has actually stopped them from making decisions at times. This is classic "analysis paralysis" - when you have so much information that you freeze up and struggle to make a decision.
• Decision regret: 85% said they had experienced 'decision distress' (regretting or questioning decisions they had made) in the past year, linked to the second-guessing caused by too much data. Instead of feeling informed, they felt anxious about whether they had made the right choice.
These findings show that more data isn't automatically better. Our brains have a limit to how much information we can process effectively. Psychological studies confirm this: even a small amount of unnecessary information can derail our thinking. In one experiment, people were given a simple model to make a decision - and most did well. But when the researchers added just a little extra (irrelevant) detail, the participants' decision-making performance plummeted. In fact, this tiny bit of extra information made their decisions just as bad as if they had been given no useful information at all. This shows how information overload can quickly undermine decision quality.
Why does this happen? Cognitive overload is the culprit - when there's too much data, people struggle to sort out the important facts from the noise. As one researcher explained, the problem isn't just the sheer volume of data, it's that we can't tell what's really important in that deluge. We get distracted by irrelevant details and lose sight of the key insights needed to make good decisions. Our mental processing power is spread too thin, leading to confusion and indecision.
If more raw data isn't the answer, then what is? The evidence points to a simple solution: focus on better insights - the right, relevant information - rather than sheer volume. In practice, this means filtering out the noise and highlighting the data that actually informs the decision at hand. Both industry experts and psychologists agree that quality beats quantity when it comes to decision information:
• Focus on the signal: Distinguished Data Scientist Seth Stephens-Davidowitz, author of Everybody Lies and Don’t Trust Your Gut; notes that people are often tempted to ignore confusing data and just go with their gut when overwhelmed. He warns that this is a mistake - the best decisions are made by properly understanding the relevant data (the useful 'signal' in the noise). In other words, it's crucial to focus on the information that's most relevant to your question and set aside the rest. When you base your decisions on clear, relevant insights, you make more confident, accurate decisions.
• Targeted information = better decisions: In an earlier experiment, researchers found that when they highlighted only the essential facts in a scenario (and removed distracting details), people's ability to make good decisions quickly returned. Similarly, when decision makers have tools or skills to extract meaning from data - for example, analytics that highlight key metrics - they feel far less overwhelmed. According to the Oracle survey, 77% of executives say typical dashboards don't directly answer their critical questions, suggesting that more targeted, decision-oriented insights would help. Put simply, people need "simple and carefully targeted" information to make good decisions, not a laundry list of every data point available.
Key takeaway: More data alone won't magically improve decisions. In fact, unfiltered data overload can cloud judgement and confidence. What does improve decisions is turning data into clear, actionable insights - finding the right information, in the right amount, to illuminate the choice. By cutting through the noise and focusing on the relevant facts, we empower ourselves (and our teams) to make smarter, faster and more confident decisions. In the end, data is only as powerful as the clarity it provides, and in this sense, the quality of insight beats the quantity of data every time.
.png)
